From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tanya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 1, 1994

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.).


Since the present appeal from the January 3, 1992 order has been rendered moot by a subsequent order of the Family Court, from which no appeal has been taken, which extended that placement for an additional twelve month period, as well as further extensions to the present, the appeal must be dismissed as moot, without costs.

Were we to address the merits, we would affirm and reject appellant's claims that the child's best interests demand her return to her mother's custody. The record established that the child had been injured by her mother's acts, that her mother refused to acknowledge those acts, that her mother continued to suffer delusional thought processes, and that a return of custody might result in further injury to the child. Although the relationship between mother and child was otherwise good, appellant's refusal or inability to acknowledge her previous behavior, and thus to correct it, warranted the court's extension of foster care.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Tanya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Tanya

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TANYA M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. PATRICIA M.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 45

Citing Cases

In re Umer K.

This fact strongly militates against returning Umer to her custody. We have previously noted that, despite an…

Matter of Umani K

In addition to the expert opinions, the court also relies heavily on the respondent mother's testimony in…