From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tamilio v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1997
238 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 3, 1997


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After participating in the family reunion program at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, petitioner, an inmate at the facility, was charged with using a controlled substance. The misbehavior report stems from the positive results of two urinalysis tests that indicated the presence of opiates. Petitioner contends that the Hearing Officer erred in refusing to allow petitioner to call his wife as a witness. Where the record reveals a valid reason for a denial of an inmate's request to call a witness (i.e., the testimony would be irrelevant or cumulative to that of other witnesses), such determination should not be annulled ( see, Matter of Roper v. McCoy, 227 A.D.2d 786, 787). Here, the Hearing Officer acknowledged and stipulated that petitioner's wife would testify that she did not provide petitioner with any drugs. The Hearing Officer further acknowledged, and petitioner agreed, that the package room would not have permitted petitioner's wife to bring any foods into the facility that contained poppy seeds, which may have caused petitioner's positive test results ( cf., Matter of Fleming v Coughlin, 222 A.D.2d 835, 836). Given these acknowledgments, we find that the Hearing Officer was justified in concluding that petitioner's wife would not have offered any material information ( see generally, Matter of McCorkle v. Coughlin, 194 A.D.2d 1034, 1035). Petitioner's assertion that other types of foods may have contributed to the positive test results is speculative. In any event, our review of the record discloses that petitioner received a fair and impartial hearing and that respondents' determination is supported by substantial evidence.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Tamilio v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1997
238 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Tamilio v. Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY TAMILIO, Petitioner, v. PHILIP COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 688

Citing Cases

Matter of Greene v. Coombe

In addition, we do not find that petitioner was improperly denied the right to call certain witnesses at the…