From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Supreme Plumbing v. Seadco Bldg. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

October, 1928.

Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to cancel and discharge mechanic's lien denied, with ten dollars costs. The Lien Law does not empower the courts to cancel or discharge mechanics' liens upon a summary application upon any grounds other than those specified in that law and there is no inherent power in the courts to cancel or discharge a mechanic's lien. ( Matter of Cohen, No. 1, 209 App. Div. 413.)


Summaries of

Matter of Supreme Plumbing v. Seadco Bldg. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Matter of Supreme Plumbing v. Seadco Bldg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Mechanic's Lien Filed by SUPREME PLUMBING CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Red Hook 160, LLC v. 2M Mech.

does not prohibit a lienor from filing a new lien on the same claim following such cancellation (see id.;…

Red Hook 160, LLC v. 2M Mech.

ing a new lien on the same claim following such cancellation (see id.; cf. Lien Law § 39 ), and the courts…