From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Strippoli v. Bickal

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 27, 1965
209 N.E.2d 123 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Submitted May 18, 1965

Decided May 27, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, WILLIAM G. EASTON, J.

William L. Clay for appellants.

Arthur B. Curran, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( John R. Garrity of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Balaban v. Rubin, 14 N.Y.2d 193, cert. den. 379 U.S. 881; Matter of Vetere v. Allen, 15 N.Y.2d 259; Matter of Van Blerkom v. Donovan, 15 N.Y.2d 399.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Strippoli v. Bickal

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 27, 1965
209 N.E.2d 123 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Strippoli v. Bickal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHRIS STRIPPOLI, Individually and as President of No. 30…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 27, 1965

Citations

209 N.E.2d 123 (N.Y. 1965)
209 N.E.2d 123
261 N.Y.S.2d 84

Citing Cases

Udut v. Nyquist

May 7, 1964, Chief Judge DESMOND asked: "The issue, we repeat, is: May [not must] the schools correct racial…

Trietley v. Bd. of Educ

We conclude that the board of education had no statutory authority to permit petitioners to use the public…