From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Stone, Freezer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 15, 1952
107 N.E.2d 509 (N.Y. 1952)

Summary

In Matter of Stone (304 N.Y. 649, supra), the arbitration clause in one of two contracts entered into by the parties was held to embrace both agreements and, accordingly, this court, in affirming the Appellate Division's order, did not reach the question to which we have adverted.

Summary of this case from Matter of Asso. Metals Minerals Corp.

Opinion

Argued May 26, 1952

Decided July 15, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, NATHAN, J.

Robert H. Haines and Frederick F. Greenman for appellant.

Jack N. Albert and Michael Halperin for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE. FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Stone, Freezer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 15, 1952
107 N.E.2d 509 (N.Y. 1952)

In Matter of Stone (304 N.Y. 649, supra), the arbitration clause in one of two contracts entered into by the parties was held to embrace both agreements and, accordingly, this court, in affirming the Appellate Division's order, did not reach the question to which we have adverted.

Summary of this case from Matter of Asso. Metals Minerals Corp.
Case details for

Matter of Stone, Freezer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between MICHAEL STONE, Appellant, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 15, 1952

Citations

107 N.E.2d 509 (N.Y. 1952)
107 N.E.2d 509

Citing Cases

Matter of Asso. Metals Minerals Corp.

This leads to the further question whether, as a general proposition, arbitrators may consider a counterclaim…

Siegel v. Ribak

In Matter of Stone ( Freezer) ( 280 App. Div. 103, 105, affd. 304 N.Y. 649), it was held that an arbitration…