From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1960
11 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

June 6, 1960


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, denying petitioner's application for a special exception to use certain property as a gasoline service station and public garage, the Zoning Board appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 5, 1960, which annulled the board's determination and which directed the issuance of a special use permit. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed. Findings of fact contained in the opinion of the Special Term, insofar as such findings are inconsistent herewith, are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination of the board that petitioner had failed to sustain its burden of proving that the proposed use would not cause any undue traffic hazards, and would not impair the character of the neighborhood or adversely affect property values. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1960
11 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Matter of Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STELL REALTY CORP., Respondent, against JOSEPH P. PLONSKI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Swim Club Corp. v. Michaelis

It follows that the board's second and third findings are also sustained by the record. There is no question…

Matter of Long Is. Light. v. Horn

The burden was upon the petitioner to satisfy the board that the proposed use would not adversely affect the…