From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Stanziale v. Executive Department

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 1981
431 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Submitted October 21, 1981

Decided November 24, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, THOMAS R. JONES, J.

Henry Stanziale for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and George C. Mantzoros of counsel), for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There is no dispute but that petitioner was a nontenured employee of the Office of General Services at the time of his termination. Because of his nontenured status, in the absence of petitioner's demonstration that the termination was for constitutionally impermissible reasons or prohibited by statute or policies established by decisional law, OGS was free to effect the termination without reasons and without a hearing (Matter of Holbrook v State Ins. Fund, 54 N.Y.2d 892; James v Board of Educ., 37 N.Y.2d 891, 892). Our review of the record here reveals that such proscriptions were not violated.

Moreover, even if the reason OGS nevertheless elected to give for the termination in this case could be said to have been stigmatizing (see, generally, Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564), any hearing to which the petitioner might be entitled under such circumstances was accorded him.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Stanziale v. Executive Department

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 1981
431 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Stanziale v. Executive Department

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN STANZIALE, Appellant, v. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 24, 1981

Citations

431 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1981)
431 N.E.2d 635
447 N.Y.S.2d 150

Citing Cases

Meyers v. City of New York

the individual has a legitimate claim of entitlement * * * The [s]tate may choose to require procedures for…

McMillan v. Dep't of Citywide Admin. Servs.

se of action to undertake in a particular matter so long as the agency's determination is rational instead of…