From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Soto v. New York State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 14, 1985
489 N.E.2d 250 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1985

Decided November 14, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Raymond E. Aldrich, Jr., J.

Roger Brazill and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Esther Furman and Maryellen Weinberg of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 107 A.D.2d 693).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

Matter of Soto v. New York State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 14, 1985
489 N.E.2d 250 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Soto v. New York State Board of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAUL SOTO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 14, 1985

Citations

489 N.E.2d 250 (N.Y. 1985)
489 N.E.2d 250
498 N.Y.S.2d 363

Citing Cases

Robertson v. Div. of Parole

Third, and most importantly, it changes the process from one in which the factual determination is made by a…

People v. Seeley

The reason Relator was not released was because he was not entitled to immediate release. (See People ex rel.…