From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smolley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1988
144 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 7, 1988

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.).


Ordered that the decree is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petition is granted.

The Surrogate's finding that the petitioner is not competent to serve as executor by reason of improvidence (see, SCPA 707 [e]) is without support in the record. Neither the fact that the petitioner, an attorney, employed an attorney to assist him by providing legal services to the estate, nor the fact that the petitioner did not enter into a retainer agreement with the attorney he so employed, without more, constitutes sufficient grounds for denying the issuance of letters testamentary to the petitioner, the named executor under the will sought to be probated (see, SCPA 707, [2]; 711; see also, Matter of Flood, 236 N.Y. 408; Matter of Leland, 219 N.Y. 387). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Smolley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1988
144 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Smolley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of JULIA T. SMOLLEY, Also Known as JULIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Smolley

By decree entered September 25, 1987, the Surrogate, sua sponte, disqualified Mr. Schwartz from being the…

In re Petition By Allen S. Fergang for the Settlement Fergang

Moreover, the court did not direct that the executor omit the reporting of administration expenses which…