From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Simon B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 8, 2001
284 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 8, 2001.

(Appeal from Order of Ontario County Family Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Abuse.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Family Court's findings that respondent's son is an abused child and that respondent's daughter is a neglected child are supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [e], [f]; § 1046 [b] [i]). The unrebutted evidence establishes that respondent abused his son by striking him repeatedly with a "heavy" wooden paddle, leaving dark bruises and large welts on his son's legs, buttocks, back, ribs, and head and causing his son to become dizzy and nauseated. Such conduct constitutes abuse ( see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [e] [i], [ii]; Matter of Gerald P., 275 A.D.2d 784, 785; Matter of Douglas QQ., 273 A.D.2d 711, 712-713; Matter of C. Children, 183 A.D.2d 767, 768). Moreover, the unrebutted evidence that respondent had previously administered similar beatings to both his son and daughter is sufficient to establish that his daughter is a neglected child ( see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Jenny N., 262 A.D.2d 951; Matter of R./W. Children, 240 A.D.2d 207, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 807; Matter of Kim HH., 239 A.D.2d 717, 719; Matter of Anthony C., 201 A.D.2d 342, 343).


Summaries of

Matter of Simon B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 8, 2001
284 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Simon B

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF SIMON B. AND CASSANDRA B. ONTARIO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 508

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Steven L

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of respondent in appeal No. 2, Family Court's finding that his…