From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shevlin v. LaGuardia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1938
18 N.E.2d 43 (N.Y. 1938)

Summary

In Matter of Shevlin v. LaGuardia (279 N.Y. 649) and in Matter of Rushford v. LaGuardia (280 N.Y. 217) it was held that section 149 was constitutional when applied to other than constitutional State officers.

Summary of this case from Finn v. City of New York

Opinion

Argued October 19, 1938

Decided November 22, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Albert De Roode for appellants.

William C. Chanler Corporation Counsel ( Seymour B. Quel and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: FINCH, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Shevlin v. LaGuardia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1938
18 N.E.2d 43 (N.Y. 1938)

In Matter of Shevlin v. LaGuardia (279 N.Y. 649) and in Matter of Rushford v. LaGuardia (280 N.Y. 217) it was held that section 149 was constitutional when applied to other than constitutional State officers.

Summary of this case from Finn v. City of New York
Case details for

Matter of Shevlin v. LaGuardia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR L. SHEVLIN et al., Appellants, against FIORELLO H…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1938

Citations

18 N.E.2d 43 (N.Y. 1938)
18 N.E.2d 43

Citing Cases

Matter of Rushford v. LaGuardia

It is agreed that there can be no recovery by those of the petitioners who failed to protest. ( Quayle v.…

Matter of Donnellan v. O'Dwyer

" Again, the law is stated in Matter of Shevlin v. LaGuardia ( 166 Misc. 473, mod. on other grounds 254 A.D.…