From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sheila

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1988
141 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 20, 1988

Appeal from the Family Court, Richmond County (Leddy, J.).


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination by the Family Court that the appellant had sexually and physically abused his adopted daughter, the subject of this proceeding, is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b]; Matter of Tammie Z., 66 N.Y.2d 1). Where, as here, the hearing court was confronted primarily with issues of credibility, its factual findings must be accorded great weight. On this record, we find no basis upon which to disturb the court's disposition of the issue (see, Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 778; Matter of Kimberly X., 133 A.D.2d 226, 227). Moreover, the appellant's claims with respect to the manner in which the hearing was conducted and several of the evidentiary rulings and statements by the Family Court are either without basis in fact or lacking in merit. Bracken, J.P., Eiber, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sheila

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1988
141 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Sheila

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHEILA L., a Child Alleged to be Abused. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

New York City Department of Social Services ex rel. Anna Marie A. v. Elena A.

Additionally, the father failed to come forward with satisfactory evidence to rebut the petitioner's case…

In re Cleo K-H.

The determination by the Family Court that the appellant mother had sexually and physically abused her…