From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 859 (N.Y. 1984)

Summary

In Matter of Sharon GG. v Duane HH. (63 NY2d 859, affg 95 AD2d 466 [3d Dept 1983]), we affirmed an order of the Appellate Division dismissing a paternity petition in which a mother sought to compel her husband to submit to a blood test as a means of challenging his paternity.

Summary of this case from In Matter of Shondel v. Mark

Opinion

Argued September 5, 1984

Decided October 11, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Kenneth P. Whiting, Jr., J.

Donald M. Sukloff for appellant.

Richard N. Aswad for Michael G.G., respondent.

James C. Gacioch for Duane HH., respondent, precluded.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Howard A. Levine ( 95 A.D.2d 466).

In view of the grounds on which we affirm we have no reason to consider or decide whether, pursuant to section 532 FCT of the Family Court Act, a wife may ever compel a blood test of her husband nor do we consider whether the best interests of the child may require the court to compel the husband to submit to a blood test.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur; Judge WACHTLER taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 859 (N.Y. 1984)

In Matter of Sharon GG. v Duane HH. (63 NY2d 859, affg 95 AD2d 466 [3d Dept 1983]), we affirmed an order of the Appellate Division dismissing a paternity petition in which a mother sought to compel her husband to submit to a blood test as a means of challenging his paternity.

Summary of this case from In Matter of Shondel v. Mark
Case details for

Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHARON G.G., Appellant, v. DUANE HH. et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 11, 1984

Citations

63 N.Y.2d 859 (N.Y. 1984)
482 N.Y.S.2d 270
472 N.E.2d 46

Citing Cases

In Matter of Shondel v. Mark

I. Did the courts below err in failing to apply the equitable doctrine of unclean hands in this case…

Matter of Thomas v. Robin

While much is made by Family Court of the alleged oral understanding between the parties that petitioner…