From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sedlacek v. IBM Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 21, 1985
108 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 21, 1985

Appeal from the State Division of Human Rights.


In May of 1983, petitioner, then 59 years old, filed a verified complaint with the State Division of Human Rights charging IBM Corporation, his employer of 41 years, with denying him a promotion over the preceding eight years because of his age. After looking into petitioner's allegations, the Division dismissed the complaint; petitioner has commenced this proceeding to review that disposition.

A determination made by the Division, following an investigation, to dismiss a complaint because probable cause is lacking will not be annulled unless it is shown to be arbitrary and capricious ( Matter of Gajjar v Union Coll., 107 A.D.2d 917; Matter of Campchero v General Elec. Broadcasting, 88 A.D.2d 747). The record here is replete with evidence, which petitioner was afforded ample opportunity to rebut, that it was petitioner's substandard performance which caused him to be passed over for promotion from the position of associate buyer to that of buyer; that 16 of IBM's 49 buyers are over 50 years of age; and that 13 of those 16 buyers were promoted within the last four years. As the Division's determination is not irrational, it should be upheld.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sedlacek v. IBM Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 21, 1985
108 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Sedlacek v. IBM Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY E. SEDLACEK, Petitioner, v. IBM CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of McFarland v. Div. of Human Rights

His conclusory allegations fail to demonstrate that his supervisors' repeated warnings as to his job…