From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schwab v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1977
41 N.Y.2d 907 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1977

Decided March 22, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, in the Second Judicial Department, JAMES F. NIEHOFF, J.

F. James Woods for appellant.

Morris H. Schneider, Corporation Counsel (David Schlachter of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. Order affirmed, with costs. The issues raised in this proceeding, if they were otherwise still available to petitioners, have been largely determined by this court after leave to appeal had been granted in this case (see Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 N.Y.2d 264, 267; cf. Matter of Board of Educ. v Yonkers Federation of Teachers, 40 N.Y.2d 268, 275-276). Most important, the collective bargaining agreement under which petitioners assert their claims expired June 30, 1975 thus terminating on any theory the right to reinstatement to their former positions. Reinstatement is the primary relief sought in this proceeding and the primary relief they persist in claiming on appeal to this court.

Damages may not be awarded in this proceeding because damages, if any, would not be incidental to primary relief (CPLR 7806). This determination is without prejudice, of course, to any other action petitioners may be advised to take (see Matter of Burke v Bowen, supra, p 267). Since more than improper form of proceeding is involved, and, moreover, petitioners do not ask for such relief in the alternative, the court does not apply the ameliorative provision of CPLR 103 (subd [c]) to convert this special proceeding.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Schwab v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1977
41 N.Y.2d 907 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Schwab v. Bowen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN SCHWAB et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD J. BOWEN, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1977

Citations

41 N.Y.2d 907 (N.Y. 1977)
394 N.Y.S.2d 616
363 N.E.2d 341

Citing Cases

Matter Golomb v. Bd. of Educ

That amendment may have been in response to the Karaffa decision, at least according to the Attorney-General…

Davidson v. Capuano

Although New York courts have not fully articulated a comprehensive test for determining when in an Article…