From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schaller v. McNab, Gaertner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 28, 1965
212 N.E.2d 776 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued October 28, 1965

Decided October 28, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN P. COHALAN, JR., J.

William F.X. Klan and William F. Lauro for appellant.

Richard Cahn for respondent.


Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Special Term reinstated, without costs. In the first place, the evidence supports the finding of Special Term that the nominating petition was properly authenticated as required by law (Election Law, § 135; see Matter of Kaplan [ Greenman], 294 N.Y. 584). In the second place, not only was there no charge that any signature had been forged, but, as both courts found below, a sufficient number of the signatures on the petition are valid.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Schaller v. McNab, Gaertner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 28, 1965
212 N.E.2d 776 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Schaller v. McNab, Gaertner

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA H. SCHALLER, Respondent, v. EVERETT F. McNAB et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 28, 1965

Citations

212 N.E.2d 776 (N.Y. 1965)
212 N.E.2d 776
265 N.Y.S.2d 290

Citing Cases

Socialist Workers Party v. Rockefeller

Plaintiffs' challenge to the "knowledge" requirement of Section 138(3) presents no difficulty. In view of the…

Molinari v. Powers

Indeed, even former § 135 was satisfied by a simple inquiry to a total stranger asking if he was a resident…