Opinion
November 23, 1998
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Ambrosio J.).
Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A suspended judgment may be revoked if the court finds that a preponderance of the evidence adduced at a violation hearing establishes noncompliance with a condition of that judgment ( see, Matter of Jennifer W., 241 A.D.2d 622; Matter of Jennifer T., 224 A.D.2d 843, 844; Matter of Joshua Justin T., 208 A.D.2d 469; Matter of Israel R., 200 A.D.2d 498; Matter of Grace Q., 200 A.D.2d 894, 895; Matter of Lawrence Clinton S., 186 A.D.2d 808, 809; Matter of Gerald M, 112 A.D.2d 6). The evidence presented at the hearings supports the Family Court's findings, inter alia, that the mother failed to satisfy certain conditions of the suspended judgments and that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of her child ( see, Matter of Orange County Dept. of Social Servs. [Jason Paul W.] v. Jeanne Z., 209 A.D.2d 703; Matter of Sharena C., 186 A.D.2d 249; Matter of Lawrence Clinton S., supra).
The mother's remaining contention is without merit.
Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and McGinity, JJ., concur.