Matter of Russell Sage Clg. v. St. Div., Human Rights

Full title: In the Matter of RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE et al., Appellants, v. STATE…

Court: Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 18, 1975

337 N.E.2d 119 (N.Y. 1975)

337 N.E.2d 119

374 N.Y.S.2d 603

Opinion

Argued June 5, 1975

Decided June 18, 1975

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, RUSSELL G. HUNT, J.

Lambert L. Ginsberg for appellants.

Howard Hertzberg, Henry Spitz and William M. Miles for respondents.

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs. Prohibition does not lie (Matter of Greater N.Y. Corp. v Commission of Human Rights, 27 N.Y.2d 898). Moreover, the remedy is discretionary and this court generally would not review the withholding of the remedy (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, §§ 149, 159).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.