From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ruffino v. Isadore Rosen Sons

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Argued September 13, 1989

Decided October 12, 1989

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Morris N. Lissauer for appellant.

Henrietta Frieder and Hugh O'Boyle for Isadore Rosen Sons and another, respondents.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Howard B. Friedland, O. Peter Sherwood, Peter H. Schiff, Jane Lauer Barker and Theresa E. Wolinski of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division ( 142 A.D.2d 177).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Matter of Ruffino v. Isadore Rosen Sons

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Ruffino v. Isadore Rosen Sons

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELLA RUFFINO, Respondent, v. ISADORE ROSEN SONS et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 12, 1989

Citations

74 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 837
547 N.E.2d 92

Citing Cases

Youngjohn v. Berry Plastics Corp.

In fact, the Carrier indicated in its memorandum of law that a lump sum award was appropriate, disputing only…

McDonald v. Water Tunnel Contrs

The Special Disability Fund had standing to challenge the determination that claimant was disabled by…