From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rosenberg v. McCormack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1998
250 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

finding that outgoing attorney was entitled to 20 percent of the total net contingent fee recovered in a personal injury action

Summary of this case from Consolver v. Hotze

Opinion

May 11, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cannizzaro, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see, Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting from the first decretal paragraph thereof the sum of $14,724.78 and substituting therefor the sum of $26,504.62; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

When there is a fee dispute between outgoing and incoming attorneys, the outgoing attorney: may elect to receive either immediate compensation based on quantum meruit for the reasonable value of services rendered or a contingent percentage fee based on the proportionate share of the work performed on the entire case ( see, Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., 73 N.Y.2d 454, 458; Schneebalg v. Lincoln Sec. Life Ins. Co., 225 A.D.2d 684). Here, the petitioner, the outgoing attorney, elected to receive a contingent percentage fee at the conclusion of the underlying personal injury action ( see, Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., supra). Consequently, the court erred to the extent that it fixed his fee based on quantum meruit. Because the record is sufficient for us to determine the appropriate fee, it is unnecessary to remit the matter for a new determination.

Considering the amount of time spent by the attorneys on the case, the nature of the work performed, and the relative contributions of counsel ( see, Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., supra, at 458, 459), we find that the petitioner is entitled to 20% of the total net contingent fee recovered in the personal injury action.

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioner's remaining contention.

Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Rosenberg v. McCormack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1998
250 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

finding that outgoing attorney was entitled to 20 percent of the total net contingent fee recovered in a personal injury action

Summary of this case from Consolver v. Hotze
Case details for

Matter of Rosenberg v. McCormack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GARY E. ROSENBERG, P.C., Appellant, v. JAMES P. McCORMACK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Monje v. Hosein

In the case of a fee dispute between outgoing and incoming attorneys, if the outgoing attorney is discharged…

Wingate, Russotti v. Friedman, Khafif

However, forfeiture of the fee occurs only where "the misconduct relates to the representation for which the…