From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Romano v. Perales

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 25, 1986
492 N.E.2d 787 (N.Y. 1986)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1986

Decided March 25, 1986

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Harold J. Hughes, J.

Martin Bradley Ashare, County Attorney (Patrick J. Barton of counsel), for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Alan W. Rubenstein, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, respondent.

V. Michael Liccione for Michael J. Nassar, as Commissioner of the Oneida County Department of Social Services, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 110 A.D.2d 1028).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.


Summaries of

Matter of Romano v. Perales

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 25, 1986
492 N.E.2d 787 (N.Y. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Romano v. Perales

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANITA ROMANO, as Commissioner of the Suffolk County…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 25, 1986

Citations

492 N.E.2d 787 (N.Y. 1986)
492 N.E.2d 787
501 N.Y.S.2d 659

Citing Cases

Matter of Weinberg v. Perales

ermination of the State commissioner pursuant to Social Services Law § 22 (9) (b). Social Services Law § 22…

Matter of O'Rourke v. Perales

The applicable Federal statute requires that any State plan under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children…