From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese v. St. Dept. of Hlth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1985

Decided December 17, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Harold J. Hughes, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Deborah Bachrach, Robert Hermann, Rosemarie Rhodes, Lawrence S. Kahn and Martha J. Olson of counsel), for New York State Department of Health and another, appellants. Kenneth J. Connolly for Health Systems Agency of Northeastern New York, Inc., appellant.

Gerald H. Katzman and Miriam M. Netter for intervenor-appellant.

Michael L. Costello, David A. Ruffo, Kevin A. Luibrand and R. Christopher Demph for respondents.

Madeline Kochen for New York Civil Liberties Union and another, amici curiae. Anne E. Simon and Nadine Taub for American Association of University Women and others, amici curiae.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

We assume, without deciding, that petitioners had standing to bring this proceeding (Association of Contr. Plumbers v Fruchtman, 64 N.Y.2d 808, 810; Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 63 N.Y.2d 100, 104; Jainchill v Citibank, 62 N.Y.2d 739, 740). On the merits, however, we agree with Justice Howard A. Levine, the dissenter at the Appellate Division, that only a fixed, general principle to be applied by an administrative agency without regard to other facts and circumstances relevant to the regulatory scheme of the statute it administers constitutes a rule or regulation required by N Y Constitution, article IV, § 8 to be filed in the office of the Department of State. We agree also, for the reasons stated by the dissenting Justice ( 109 A.D.2d, at p 148), that the 50% guideline employed by the Department of Health in passing on the applications involved in the present proceeding did not constitute and was not applied as such a rule, and in view of that conclusion do not reach the constitutional arguments presented by the intervenor and amici.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese v. St. Dept. of Hlth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese v. St. Dept. of Hlth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY et al., Respondents, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 1985

Citations

66 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1985)
498 N.Y.S.2d 780
489 N.E.2d 749

Citing Cases

Opn. No. 96-F7

State Administrative Procedure Act § 102(2)(a)(i). In conjunction with criteria it had previously…

In the Matter of v. N.Y. State Racing and Wagering Bd.

Capital Dist. Regional Off-Track Betting Corp., 162 AD2d 865.) Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP, Garden City…