From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Robert S. Swords

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Kings County
Mar 1, 1923
120 Misc. 427 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1923)

Opinion

March, 1923.

Barker D. Leich, for executrix.

Shiland, Hedges Pelham, for next of kin.

Albert D. Schauzer, special guardian.

Goodbody, Danforth Glenn, for objecting creditor Charles Schroeder.


The writings signed by Robert S. Swords and Charlotte N. Swords, husband and wife, bearing date November 26, 1921, are, in effect, an agreement for their separation. By the terms of this agreement the husband agreed to accept $1,500 and relinquished all claims upon property in his wife's name and promised not to annoy her in any way, while the wife in consideration of her husband agreeing to accept the $1,500 and relinquishing all claim against the property standing in her name, relinquished all and any claims against him or his real and personal estate, and agreed to make no claim for alimony against him. Whatever the validity of the agreement may have been, it was, so far as the wife was concerned, merely an attempt, effectual or otherwise, to release any claim of ownership which she had in property standing in his name, her right to support from him, and, further, to refrain from asking for alimony.

The husband, the decedent herein, had the legal right to dispose of his property by will, after, as well as before, such agreement was made, and his retention of the will, made before the date of the agreement, was a continued ratification thereof; and upon his death the legacy to his wife contained in his will, speaking as of that time, became effective as a gift from him to her, with the same force as if such will was made after the date of the writings comprising the agreement mentioned. The paper signed by the wife at the time of the separation of herself and her husband, was not intended as and did not result in a satisfaction of her legacy under his will, and did not destroy her right to take the property devised to her by his will. Nor could it be construed in any respect as a revocation of his will or of the benefit therein contained for the wife.

The claim of Charles Schroeder is allowed as a charge against the estate in the sum of $511.60.

Submit decision and decree with notice of settlement.

Decreed accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Robert S. Swords

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Kings County
Mar 1, 1923
120 Misc. 427 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1923)
Case details for

Matter of Robert S. Swords

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Petition of CHARLOTTE VAN HOUTEN SWORDS to Render and…

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Kings County

Date published: Mar 1, 1923

Citations

120 Misc. 427 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1923)
199 N.Y.S. 572

Citing Cases

In re the Estate of Torr

The determination in these cases was premised on a finding that the terms of the later agreement affected…

Matter of Maruccia

The results reached often depended upon the particular facts of each case. In approaching the question…