From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ranft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1944
268 App. Div. 136 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

June 28, 1944.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County, WASSERVOGEL, J.

Henry A. Mulcahy of counsel ( Ralph P. Buell and John F. Kiernan with him on the brief; Humes, Buck, Smith Stowell, attorneys), for appellant.

L. Reyner Samet of counsel ( Thomas A. Ryan with him on the brief; Milbank, Tweed Hope, attorneys), for respondent, The Chase National Bank of the City of New York.


The petitioner's motion for leave to account as testamentary trustee should be denied and the parties remitted to proceedings in the Surrogate's Court of Suffolk County, where the petitioner received its appointment as testamentary trustee. Although the Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction over testamentary trust accountings it will not ordinarily exercise that jurisdiction unless appropriate relief cannot be obtained in the Surrogate's Court. ( Matter of Smith, 120 App. Div. 199; Post v. Ingraham, 122 App. Div. 738.) The petition here discloses no facts indicating that the Surrogate's Court is not competent to afford complete relief.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion of petitioner for the judicial settlement of its account denied and the cross motion of Herma T. Schuck to dismiss the petition granted.

MARTIN, P.J., TOWNLEY, GLENNON, UNTERMYER and COHN, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion of petitioner for the judicial settlement of its account denied and the cross motion of Herma T. Schuck to dismiss the petition granted.


Summaries of

Matter of Ranft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1944
268 App. Div. 136 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Matter of Ranft

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of the CHASE NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 136 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
49 N.Y.S.2d 125

Citing Cases

Tuck v. Tuck

This action to impress a trust does not fall within the class of actions which may be said to come within…

Sullivan v. Title Guarantee Trust Co.

xamples: Bloomingdale v. Bloomingdale, 258 App. Div. 231, 16 N.Y.S.2d 359; In re Buehler's Estate, 186 Misc.…