From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pitney

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1906
78 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1906

Decided October 16, 1906

George W. Carr for appellant.

Edgar J. Nathan for trustees, respondents.

William T. Gilbert for Charles C. Lockwood, as special guardian, respondent.


The selection of a new or substituted trustee rested in the discretion of the Supreme Court and is not subject to review by this court.

It is extremely doubtful, to say the least, whether the infant has any interest in the corpus of the trust fund. Therefore, the compensation for the services of the guardian was necessarily limited to taxed costs and the court was not authorized to make him an allowance. ( Matter of Holden, 126 N.Y. 589; Matter of Robinson, 40 App. Div. 30; affd., 160 N.Y. 448.)

The order appealed from should be modified so as to strike out the allowance to the guardian ad litem, and in lieu thereof direct that said guardian be paid his costs to be taxed, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ., concur.

Order accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Pitney

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1906
78 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Matter of Pitney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of HENRY C. PITNEY et al., as Trustees…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 16, 1906

Citations

78 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)
78 N.E. 1110

Citing Cases

Spencer v. Spencer

The following cases illustrate the rule, perhaps as well as any others: Matter of Albertson ( 113 N.Y. 434);…

Matter of Wardman

Trusts of personal property should, ordinarily, have no such burden of carrying charges. Again, the decision…