Opinion
December 4, 1995
Motions by the respondents Daniel A. Angiolillo and Rocco A. Pozzi to dismiss the proceedings.
Upon the petition and the papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motions, it is
Ordered that the motions are granted; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, People v Cohen, 222 A.D.2d 447 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.