From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Pinto v. Competent Fur Dressers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1948
78 N.E.2d 864 (N.Y. 1948)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1948

Decided March 11, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Sidney A. Schwartz and Edward Ash for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Martin Shulman and Paul V. Petrillo for Mary Pinto, respondent.

Bernard Katzen, General Attorney ( George J. Hayes and Victor Fiddler of counsel), for the State Insurance Fund, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Pinto v. Competent Fur Dressers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1948
78 N.E.2d 864 (N.Y. 1948)
Case details for

Claim of Pinto v. Competent Fur Dressers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARY PINTO, Respondent, against COMPETENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 11, 1948

Citations

78 N.E.2d 864 (N.Y. 1948)
78 N.E.2d 864

Citing Cases

Matter of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.

It would encroach upon the field of the disability benefits law enacted by chapter 600 of the Laws of 1949,…

Matter of Lounsbury v. United States Gypsum

( Matter of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp., 309 N.Y. 558, 562, 561.) Although, upon at least one record,…