From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Penfield Mechanical Contractors v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1984
470 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1983

Decided October 9, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Peter E. Corning, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( John Q. Driscoll and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellants.

Bernard T. King for intervenor-appellant.

Thomas G. Dignan, Robb M. Jones and Michael A. Hausknecht for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs ( Matter of Erie County Ind. Dev. Agency v Roberts, 63 N.Y.2d 810, decided herewith). Question certified not answered as unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Penfield Mechanical Contractors v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1984
470 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Penfield Mechanical Contractors v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PENFIELD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Respondent, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 9, 1984

Citations

470 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1984)
470 N.E.2d 870
481 N.Y.S.2d 72

Citing Cases

Twin State CCS Corp. v. Roberts

We similarly find unpersuasive petitioner's arguments that the contract was not "public work" to which Labor…

National Railroad Corp. v. Hartnett

n service for the Empire and Northeast Corridors. Under the contracts with the State, Amtrak, a private…