From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Payton v. New York City Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 21, 1960
167 N.E.2d 649 (N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

Argued April 1, 1960

Decided April 21, 1960

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Lawrence R. Bailey for appellant.

Edward W. Summers, Daniel T. Scannell and Helen R. Cassidy for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs. The determination by the New York City Transit Authority is supported by substantial evidence. Insofar as the disciplinary action taken is claimed to have been excessive, power to review is conferred upon appellate courts by subdivision 5-a of section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act. We hold, however, that the discretion of the Authority was not abused in imposing the measure of discipline involved. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

Matter of Payton v. New York City Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 21, 1960
167 N.E.2d 649 (N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

Matter of Payton v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EMANUEL J. PAYTON, Appellant, against NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 21, 1960

Citations

167 N.E.2d 649 (N.Y. 1960)
167 N.E.2d 649
201 N.Y.S.2d 108

Citing Cases

Matter of Yelyn v. N.Y. St. Bingo Ctrl. Comm

In view of the fact that he received his own expense check as well as the expense check of the fellow…

Matter of Walker v. Murphy

There is substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's determination that the petitioner was guilty of…