From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Patino v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1987
135 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

December 14, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner violated a State and institutional rule prohibiting the refusal to obey a direct order (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130).

Further, since the petitioner never claimed during the administrative proceedings that he had not received a copy of the State rule book, that claim cannot be judicially reviewed (see, Matter of Klapak v Blum, 65 N.Y.2d 670; Matter of Photo Medic Equip. v Suffolk County Dept. of Health Servs., 122 A.D.2d 882). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Patino v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1987
135 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Patino v. Scully

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of OSWALDO PATINO, Appellant, v. CHARLES J. SCULLY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1987

Citations

135 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of Johnson v. Coughlin

The petitioner never claimed during any of the aforementioned administrative hearings that he had not timely…

Matter of Buffolino v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Therefore, the Supreme Court's judgment must be reversed and the determination denying the variance…