From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Paroli v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 14, 1974
320 N.E.2d 866 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1974

Decided November 14, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, CLARE J. HOYT, J.

James R. Brown, Jr. for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( John Q. Driscoll and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for New York State Department of Civil Service, respondent.

William J. Ciolko, Dutchess County Public Defender, amicus curiae.


Order affirmed, with costs in all courts to petitioner-appellant, in the following memorandum: In affirming the court notes the opportunity of petitioner-appellant to apply to the appropriate Civil Service Commissions and that of his employer, the Public Defender, to apply for a reclassification of the positions of Investigator and Chief Investigator in the office of the Dutchess County Public Defender. In view of the prolonged delay in progressing the appeal before the Appellate Division and the consequent aggravation of the uncertainty of the status of the petitioner during the pendency of the litigation, costs are awarded to petitioner in all courts.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS.


Summaries of

Matter of Paroli v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 14, 1974
320 N.E.2d 866 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Paroli v. Bolton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM L. PAROLI, Appellant, v. J. LEWIS BOLTON et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 14, 1974

Citations

320 N.E.2d 866 (N.Y. 1974)
320 N.E.2d 866
362 N.Y.S.2d 150

Citing Cases

Matter of Grossman v. Rankin

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.; Kupferman, J., concurs in the following…

Matter of Grossman v. Rankin

To reiterate, in the final analysis, the focus of the court must be on whether "the position is clearly one…