From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Paris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1990
160 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 19, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


On April 16, 1975, petitioner James Paris formed the respondent corporation, Anthony Ave. Realty Corp., to own and manage a building located at 501 West 189th Street in Manhattan. In September of 1975, petitioner sold one half of his interest in the closely held corporation to Martha and Edmond Contouris, retaining half of the stock for himself. Subsequently, on July 28, 1976, petitioner agreed to sell the remaining shares of his stock to Mr. and Mrs. Contouris for $4,900, which was to be paid in monthly installments of $100 from September 1, 1976 to September 1, 1980.

It is undisputed that petitioner never received the $100 monthly payments under the terms of the stock transfer agreement and that Mr. and Mrs. Contouris continued to operate the subject building as the sole owners of the corporation. Nevertheless, petitioner admittedly took no action to enforce his rights under that agreement nor did he seek damages for its breach until more than 12 years after transferring his shares in the corporation, when he commenced the underlying dissolution proceeding in July of 1988 alleging dissension between the shareholders.

Petitioner has offered no explanation whatsoever for his failure to assert a claim, to demand payment, or to attempt to enforce or rescind the stock transfer agreement for more than 12 years after the shares were transferred. We therefore find that petitioner's claim was barred by the six-year contractual Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 213 and by the equitable doctrine of laches. Petitioner had endorsed the certificate and written the word "void" across its face thereby relinquishing his interests in the corporation. The record further reveals that respondents, relying on petitioner's acquiescence, dedicated their finances, time and efforts to the preservation of the subject property. (Cf., Matter of Barabash, 31 N.Y.2d 76, rearg denied 31 N.Y.2d 963; Dante v. 310 Assocs., 121 A.D.2d 332, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 607.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Paris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1990
160 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Paris

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES PARIS, Appellant. ANTHONY AVE. REALTY CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 192

Citing Cases

Tanna v. Lentini

us capacities as officers and/or directors of the close corporations lying at the heart of the Lentini Trust,…

Pappas v. Fotinos

The equitable doctrine of laches apparently applies in a proceeding seeking judicial dissolution of a…