From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Orto v. Poggioni

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1936
2 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1936)

Summary

In Orto v. Poggioni, 245 App. Div. (N.Y.) 782, affirmed 271 N.Y. 551, a contrary holding by the industrial board was affirmed without opinion.

Summary of this case from Century Indemnity Co. v. Jameson

Opinion

Argued April 15, 1936

Decided May 1, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

William S. Sinclair and James J. Mahoney for appellant.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum and Henry Epstein of counsel), for State Industrial Board respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Orto v. Poggioni

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1936
2 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1936)

In Orto v. Poggioni, 245 App. Div. (N.Y.) 782, affirmed 271 N.Y. 551, a contrary holding by the industrial board was affirmed without opinion.

Summary of this case from Century Indemnity Co. v. Jameson
Case details for

Claim of Orto v. Poggioni

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of NICK ORTO, Respondent, against JERRY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

2 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1936)
2 N.E.2d 690

Citing Cases

Century Indemnity Co. v. Jameson

Our conclusion with respect to a policy of workmen's compensation insurance has been upheld in Matlock v.…

Oster v. Riley

When the loss occurred, the employer thought he was covered. In fact, the binder was not made until some 4…