From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nolan v. Cranford Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1916
114 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1916

Decided October 24, 1916

George A. Blauvelt, Joseph A. Warren and Francis J. MacIntyre for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and CARDOZO, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Nolan v. Cranford Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1916
114 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of Nolan v. Cranford Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARGARET NOLAN, Respondent, against CRANFORD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1916

Citations

114 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1916)
219 N.Y. 581

Citing Cases

Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson Norris Co.

The Thompson Norris Company engaged trucks and chauffeurs at a given price per day as laborers are employed…

Lee v. Cranford Co., Inc.

In Matter of De Noyer v. Cavanaugh ( 221 N.Y. 273) claimant's intestate was driver of a truck owned by the…