From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Noel v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding to compel the Board of Elections of the County of Putnam to reinstate her to the civil service position of Senior Clerk retroactive to January 2, 1991, and pay her the salary, benefits and all other emoluments of the position retroactive to that date. In her petition she asserts several reasons for the wrongful termination of her employment. She also alleged that the statute by which she was categorized as an "unclassified" employee (see, Civil Service Law § 35 [f]) is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition in its entirety, finding that the petitioner failed to serve a notice of claim with respect to those causes of action which alleged wrongful termination, and that her application for leave to serve a late notice of claim was not timely. The remaining cause of action, wherein the petitioner asserted that Civil Service Law § 35 (f) is unconstitutional, was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to name the Attorney-General as a party. We affirm, but on somewhat different grounds.

Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the petitioner was not required to serve a notice of claim with respect to her first and second "causes of action" (see, Dutcher v Town of Shandaken, 97 A.D.2d 922; Bass Bldg. Corp. v Village of Pomona, 142 A.D.2d 657; County Law § 52; General Municipal Law § 50-e). However, those "causes of action" were properly dismissed, as the petitioner, an at will, unclassified employee, does not make out "causes of action" sounding in wrongful termination upon which relief can be based.

Finally, we agree with the Supreme Court's determination that dismissal of the third "cause of action" was warranted because the petitioner failed to serve the Attorney-General as a necessary party (see, Executive Law § 71; Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ., 44 A.D.2d 198, mod on other grounds 35 N.Y.2d 534). Miller, J.P., Lawrence, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Noel v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Noel v. Board of Elections

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEAN M. NOEL, Appellant, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

Picciano v. Nassau Civil Service Commission

County Law § 52 applies where an action is solely equitable in nature (see, Boyle v. Kelley, 42 N.Y.2d 88),…

Matter of Noel v. Bd. of Elections of Cnty of Putnam

Decided September 22, 1994 Appeal from (2d Dept: 203 A.D.2d 576) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…