From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of New York University v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1937
251 App. Div. 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Summary

In Matter of New York University v. Taylor (251 App. Div. 444, affd. 276 N.Y. 620) a similar argument was made and rejected in connection with the sales tax claimed to be applicable to sales in a book store conducted by New York University.

Summary of this case from Matter of Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. McGoldrick

Opinion

June 22, 1937.

Chester Bordeau of counsel [ Adrian L. Foley with him on the brief; White Case, attorneys], for the petitioner.

Robert C. Rand of counsel [ Sol Charles Levine, Edmund B. Hennefeld and Robert Granville Burke with him on the brief; Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel, attorney], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., UNTERMYER, DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ.; UNTERMYER, J., dissents and votes to dismiss order of certiorari and confirm determination.


We are of the opinion that petitioner, New York University, comes within the exemption contained in New York City Local Law No. 20 of 1934 (published as No. 21), known as the Retail Sales Tax Act, as amended by Local Law No. 24 of 1934 (published as No. 25). (Local Law No. 29 of 1935; Local Law No. 31 of 1936.)

The local law provides as follows: "Receipts from sales or services * * * by or to semi-public institutions * * * shall not be subject to tax hereunder." (§ 2.)

The local law defines a "semi-public" institution as "Those charitable and religious institutions which are supported wholly or in part by public subscriptions or endowment and are not organized or operated for profit." (§ 1, subd. [h].)

It is undisputed that petitioner is an institution supported in part by public subscription and endowment and is not organized or operated for profit. Moreover, we think that it is a charitable institution within the meaning of the statute ( Hamburger v. Cornell University, 240 N.Y. 328; Butterworth v. Keeler, 219 id. 446) and accordingly is not subject to the provisions of the Sales Tax Act.

The order of certiorari should be sustained and the comptroller's determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner.


Order of certiorari sustained and determination of the comptroller of the city of New York annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner.


Summaries of

Matter of New York University v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1937
251 App. Div. 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

In Matter of New York University v. Taylor (251 App. Div. 444, affd. 276 N.Y. 620) a similar argument was made and rejected in connection with the sales tax claimed to be applicable to sales in a book store conducted by New York University.

Summary of this case from Matter of Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. McGoldrick
Case details for

Matter of New York University v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, Petitioner, for a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1937

Citations

251 App. Div. 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
296 N.Y.S. 848

Citing Cases

Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Philadelphia

The judgment of the Supreme Court was affirmed June 22, 1937 by the Appellate Division, 251 App. Div. 821,…

People ex Rel. Doctors Hospital v. Sexton

Moreover, the legal meaning of charitable purposes is not necessarily limited to free service to the poor. (…