From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of New York State Urban Dev. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1995
215 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 25, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.).


We agree with the Special Referee that petitioner was discharged without cause. There is no evidence of any statements of dissatisfaction with counsel's efforts prior to the date of discharge, respondents' testimony at the hearing being conclusory and unsupported. We note that respondents, by their own conduct, prevented the filing of the notice of claim by petitioner. We do find, however, from the evidence before us that the fee awarded by the Referee was excessive and that $20,000 is a more appropriate figure to compensate petitioner for his time and effort.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of New York State Urban Dev. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1995
215 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of New York State Urban Dev. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Relative to…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 25, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 799

Citing Cases

Chadbourne & Parke, LLP v. AB Recur Finans

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ., concur. Where the client has not…

BRUK v. ALBIN

The Supreme Court properly found that the appellant did not discharge the respondents, who are attorneys, for…