From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of New York State Labor Rel. Board v. Union Club

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1946
68 N.E.2d 29 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Argued March 4, 1946

Decided May 29, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, VALENTE, J.

William E. Grady, Jr., Philip Feldblum and Louis E. Goldstein for appellant.

Edward G. Bathon and Charles R. Barrett for respondent.


Order of the Appellate Division reversed, and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that there is evidence sufficient to support the finding of the Labor Relations Board that the employer's dismissal of the employees McTeague and Jacobs was motivated by their concerted union activities. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and DYE, JJ. Taking no part: THACHER and MEDALIE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of New York State Labor Rel. Board v. Union Club

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1946
68 N.E.2d 29 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

Matter of New York State Labor Rel. Board v. Union Club

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant, against…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1946

Citations

68 N.E.2d 29 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 29

Citing Cases

MATTER OF LABOR REL. BD. v. CHARMAN SERV. CORP.

(Matter of Skyview Transp. Co., 92 N. L. R. B., No. 251.) Thereupon Florio, in order to protect himself…

Matter of Labor Rel. Bd. v. Charman Serv

( Matter of Skyview Transp. Co., 92 N.L.R.B., No. 251.) Thereupon Florio, in order to protect himself against…