From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of New York Conference Association v. Schenck

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 15, 1952
107 N.E.2d 654 (N.Y. 1952)

Summary

In New York Conference Assoc. v. Schenck (1952) 304 N.Y. 706 [ 107 N.E.2d 654], the New York Court of Appeals in a memorandum opinion, affirmed an exemption in the face of a claim that the sale of substantial or regular surpluses of farm products would deprive a religious organization of an exemption concededly not lost by production for consumption by those engaged in the educational activities of that organization.

Summary of this case from San Francisco Boys' Club v. County of Mendocino

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1952

Decided July 15, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, WARNER, J.

Robert D. Jones for appellants.

Raymond M. Bush for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of New York Conference Association v. Schenck

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 15, 1952
107 N.E.2d 654 (N.Y. 1952)

In New York Conference Assoc. v. Schenck (1952) 304 N.Y. 706 [ 107 N.E.2d 654], the New York Court of Appeals in a memorandum opinion, affirmed an exemption in the face of a claim that the sale of substantial or regular surpluses of farm products would deprive a religious organization of an exemption concededly not lost by production for consumption by those engaged in the educational activities of that organization.

Summary of this case from San Francisco Boys' Club v. County of Mendocino
Case details for

Matter of New York Conference Association v. Schenck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH-DAY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 15, 1952

Citations

107 N.E.2d 654 (N.Y. 1952)
107 N.E.2d 654

Citing Cases

San Francisco Boys' Club v. County of Mendocino

( Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda, supra, 153 Cal.App.2d 673, 699; and see Sarah Dix Hamlin…

People ex Rel. Watchtower Soc. v. Haring

The finding to the contrary is not only opposed to the facts but it is inconsistent with the results reached…