From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Naila v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 1995
215 A.D.2d 183 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Levy, J.).


In order for a hospital to retain a patient for involuntary psychiatric care, it must establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that the patient is mentally ill and in need of continued care and treatment, and that she poses a substantial threat of physical harm to herself or others (Matter of Seltzer v Hogue, 187 A.D.2d 230, 237).

The mere fact that respondent, who suffers from mental illness, was hungry and homeless at the time she voluntarily presented herself at the hospital does not evidence a "neglect or refusal to care for [herself]" from which it may be concluded that she presents a "`serious harm' to [her] own well-being" (Matter of Boggs v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 132 A.D.2d 340, 362, appeal dismissed 70 N.Y.2d 972). The evidence established that respondent, who had lived alone and provided for her own needs for a period of approximately 20 years, had lived in a boarding house just weeks before her hospitalization. While there, she paid a monthly rent from disability monies which she received and had been saving for some time. Respondent, who was otherwise healthy, expressed both an understanding of her need to care for herself upon release and a plan to do so.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Naila v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 1995
215 A.D.2d 183 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Naila v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NAILA Y., Respondent, v. JOSE R. SANCHEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 9, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 183 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 153

Citing Cases

Matter of Robinson v. Sanchez

Under an original order of retention, governed by Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33, in order for a hospital to…

MATTER OF CHARLES JUDGE

This holding would appear to be inconsistent with later Appellate Division decisions, wherein the burden of…