From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of N. Dain's Sons Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 30, 1912
98 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Submitted January 11, 1912

Decided January 30, 1912

Nathan P. Bushnell for appellant.

Robert W. Bernard for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative on opinion of MILLER, J., in Matter of Schlotterer ( 105 App. Div. 115).

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of N. Dain's Sons Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 30, 1912
98 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Matter of N. Dain's Sons Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of N. DAIN'S SONS COMPANY, Appellant, for…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 30, 1912

Citations

98 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1912)
98 N.E. 1102

Citing Cases

Matter of Mccormick

Thomas F. Powers for respondent. Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion. (See Matter of Attorney-General,…

Lauffer v. Eastern Star Temple

Under the provisions of the former Code of Civil Procedure there was a conflict in the First, Second and…