From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1994
204 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 16, 1994

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.).


Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the proponent personally.

The proponent offered a document for probate which was missing the bottom portion of the page which would have contained the decedent's signature and the signatures of attesting witnesses. A testator may effect revocation of a will, inter alia, by an act of cutting or mutilation (see, EPTL 3-4.1 [a] [2] [A] [i]). The proponent conceded that he had no evidence as to how the signature was removed or where the signature was. The existence of the will in a cut and mutilated condition created the presumption that the decedent intended to revoke her will (see, Matter of Bonner, 17 N.Y.2d 9, 11). The Surrogate properly refused to allow the jury to speculate on the issue of revocation and properly denied the petition for probate, as the proponent failed to adduce any evidence to rebut the presumption of revocation.

We have examined the proponent's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1994
204 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Muller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of TERESA M. MULLER, Deceased. WILLIAM MULLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 311

Citing Cases

Abselet v. Satra Realty, LLC

Accordingly, the motions of Satra, Anavim and Soleimani for judgment during trial were properly granted.…