Opinion
January 22, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner, the owner of an irregular parcel of property in Westchester County, submitted two alternative plans to the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greenburgh (hereinafter ZBA) seeking numerous variances including, inter alia, a reduction in the number of required parking spaces and certain setback variances. After a hearing, at which evidence was adduced that indicated that the petitioner's requested variances would, inter alia, result in an unacceptable exacerbation of the already congested and hazardous traffic conditions in the area, the ZBA denied the petitioner's application. We now affirm.
Contrary to the petitioner's assertions on appeal, the ZBA's determination had a rational basis and was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 N.Y.2d 441; Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 40 N.Y.2d 309; Town Law § 267-b).
We have considered the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.