From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mortenson v. United Parcel Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 16, 1992
185 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

July 16, 1992

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits on July 29, 1987, stating that he had sustained a myocardial infarction on July 17, 1985 as a result of work performed for his employer on June 15, 1985. The workers' compensation insurance carrier asserted, inter alia, that the claim was untimely pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 28, which bars the right to compensation when a claim is not filed within two years of the date of the accident unless there has been an advance payment of compensation. Claimant contended that his employer's continued payment of his wages during a portion of his disability constituted an advance payment of compensation. Based on the evidence presented at a hearing, the Workers' Compensation Board concluded that the payments received by claimant were made pursuant to company policy without regard to the cause of the injury and were not in the nature of an advance payment of compensation. Claimant appeals.

Unless the remuneration is provided by the employer or carrier in conjunction with some acknowledgment or recognition of liability under the Workers' Compensation Law, there can be no finding of an advance payment within the meaning of Workers' Compensation Law § 28 (Matter of Manzo v. Twin Oaks Rest., 127 A.D.2d 919, 920). "[W]hen payments are made regardless of the cause of the injury, there is no basis for claiming advance payment" (Matter of Schultz v. Voltro Distribs., 92 A.D.2d 990, 991). There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's factual finding that claimant's compensation was continued without regard to the cause of the injury and, therefore, the Board's decision must be affirmed.

Weiss, P.J., Levine, Mercure and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Mortenson v. United Parcel Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 16, 1992
185 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Mortenson v. United Parcel Service

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOSEPH MORTENSON, Appellant, v. UNITED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Schneider v. Dunkirk Ice Cream

It is correct to state that under Workers' Compensation Law § 28, remuneration or payments by an employer or…

Matter, Robinson v. N.Y.C. Dept., Soc. Serv

Workers' Compensation Law § 28 Work. Comp. provides that no case in which an advance payment is made to an…