From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Morse v. Mignone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 16, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Custody matters are within the discretion of the Family Court, and its findings should be accorded great deference on appeal since it was in the best position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties ( see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173-174; Matter of Canazon v. Canazon, 215 A.D.2d 652; Klat v. Klat, 176 A.D.2d 922, 923). Thus, its determination should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record ( see, Matter of Canazon v Canazon, supra; Crum v. Crum, 122 A.D.2d 771).

We find no basis to disturb the Family Court's determination in this case. It is in the best interest of the child to be placed with her father ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, supra, at 171).

Miller, J.P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Morse v. Mignone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Morse v. Mignone

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LISA MORSE, Appellant, v. THOMAS MIGNONE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 791

Citing Cases

Nikki Desroches v. Brian Desroches

Custody matters are within the sound discretion of the Family Court, whose findings should be accorded great…

Matter of Rueckert v. Reilly

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting so much of the third decretal paragraph…