From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Morris v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1984
106 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 10, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The arbitrator's award cannot fairly be said to have been totally irrational. Rather the arbitrator interpreted the disputed term of the contract in light of what he found to be the intent of the parties ( Matter of Local Div. 1179 [ Green Bus Lines], 50 N.Y.2d 1007). The award also is not violative of public policy (see Matter of Sprinzen [ Nomberg], 46 N.Y.2d 623). Thompson, J.P., O'Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Morris v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1984
106 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Morris v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD MORRIS, Individually and on Behalf of All Deputy…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Murray v. Cornette

In this case, the NYSE arbitration panel did not provide reasons for their decision. However, upon a thorough…

Matter of Moore v. Bamaco Group America, Inc.

Moreover, the award itself is not a totally irrational interpretation of the disputed contract provision. It…