From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Moody's Investors Service v. McGoldrick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1939
20 N.E.2d 25 (N.Y. 1939)

Summary

In Matter of Moody's Investors Service v. McGoldrick (280 N.Y. 581, affg. 254 App. Div. 726) this court and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion.

Summary of this case from Matter of Business Statistics Org. v. Joseph

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1939

Decided March 7, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Richard T. Greene, James L. Dohr and Daniel S. Murphy for appellant.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Arthur A. Segall, Sol Charles Levine and Edmund B. Hennefeld of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ. HUBBS and RIPPEY, JJ., dissent on the authority of Dun Bradstreet, Inc., v. City of New York ( 276 N.Y. 198).


Summaries of

Matter of Moody's Investors Service v. McGoldrick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1939
20 N.E.2d 25 (N.Y. 1939)

In Matter of Moody's Investors Service v. McGoldrick (280 N.Y. 581, affg. 254 App. Div. 726) this court and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion.

Summary of this case from Matter of Business Statistics Org. v. Joseph
Case details for

Matter of Moody's Investors Service v. McGoldrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, Appellant, against JOSEPH D…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 7, 1939

Citations

20 N.E.2d 25 (N.Y. 1939)
20 N.E.2d 25

Citing Cases

Community Telecasting Services v. Johnson

By virtue of extensive litigation in the State of New York, involving its New York City Retail Sales Tax Law,…

Matter of Business Statistics Org. v. Joseph

Although that was not the motive of the City Comptroller, to confirm his ruling herein would not only…