From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Montanez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 12, 1989
156 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 12, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.).


The court properly found that counsel's failure was not a satisfactory excuse "for the filing of a notice of claim more than nine months after the alleged incident". (See, Zarrello v City of New York, 93 A.D.2d 886 [2d Dept], affd 61 N.Y.2d 628.)

We also agree that petitioner's broken leg was not an incapacitation preventing the filing of a claim.

Further, we find that none of the other factors contained in section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law which justify an extension of time is present in the instant case.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Montanez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 12, 1989
156 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Montanez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JESUS MONTANEZ, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 441

Citing Cases

Rosado v. Trinity Church

Plaintiff's notice of claim, which defendant properly rejected on July 21, 1993 as filed more than 90 days…

Matter of Johnston v. Town of Putnam Valley

Even if we were to accept petitioner's argument that a fact finder could reasonably conclude that a…