From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1936
5 N.E.2d 378 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued November 17, 1936

Decided December 1, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Charles P. Barre for appellants.

Milton Gould and Charles Landesman for claimant, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1936
5 N.E.2d 378 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HENRIETTA MOHR, Respondent, against WIEBUSCH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 1, 1936

Citations

5 N.E.2d 378 (N.Y. 1936)
5 N.E.2d 378

Citing Cases

Matter of Voelker v. Rosenberg's Sons

The commutation vacated and modified that award. It was error to refuse the request for a hearing. ( Matter…

MATTER OF MEIT v. P.S. M. CATERING CORP

Section 117 empowers the board to 'adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions…