From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meyers

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Feb 15, 1938
166 Misc. 712 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1938)

Opinion

February 15, 1938.

Strasbourger Schallek, for The Hebrew Orphan Asylum of the City of New York.

Tanner, Sillcocks Friend, for the petitioners, as executors, etc.

Proskauer, Rose Paskus [ Alfred L. Rose and Jacob P. Aronson of counsel], for the Mount Sinai Hospital, respondent.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark Hupper, for the Henry Street Settlement.

Stroock Stroock, for the Montefiore Hospital for Chronic Diseases.


In this executor's accounting a question of construction is presented for determination by reason of the fourteenth paragraph of the will of the testatrix which disposes of her residuary estate. By that paragraph the residue is bequeathed to Mount Sinai Hospital of New York City, "to be used by it for the construction of a new building or to be used by it to dedicate the building called `The Semi-Private Pavilion.'" She further provided that the building be dedicated in perpetuity and that a plaque be placed on it as follows: "This building is Dedicated to the Memory of Abraham and Amelia Meyers."

Mount Sinai Hospital has accepted the bequest but in its answer alleges that it cannot comply literally with the terms of the will. The residuary estate is less than $250,000 which sum, it is stated, is insufficient for the construction, by the hospital, of an entire new building. The money cannot be used to dedicate the building called "The Semi-Private Pavilion" because that building has already been dedicated. Instead the hospital proposed to construct upon the roof of one of its existing buildings a new structure devoted to medical research and laboratory use and to place upon it an appropriate tablet of the origin of the gift.

The proposal of the hospital, when carried out, will substantially effectuate the intention of the testatrix. Pursuant to the provisions of section 12 Pers. Prop., subdivision 2, of the Personal Property Law, which vest in this court cy pres powers, and under the authority of Matter of Gary ( 161 Misc. 351; affd., 248 A.D. 373; affd., 272 N.Y. 635) and Matter of Swan ( 237 A.D. 454; affd., 263 N.Y. 638), the surrogate will approve the objects of the modified plan of the hospital.

Submit decree on notice construing the will and settling the account accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Meyers

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Feb 15, 1938
166 Misc. 712 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1938)
Case details for

Matter of Meyers

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of AMELIA A. MEYERS, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Feb 15, 1938

Citations

166 Misc. 712 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1938)
3 N.Y.S.2d 117

Citing Cases

Matter of Nellis Athletic Fund

It is the general rule that the courts will apply the cy pres doctrine if the donor's specific directions are…

Matter of Leo

The authority to employ the cy pres doctrine to the charitable gifts in this will is not open to question. (…